Anticancer activity of the protozoan Trypanosoma cruzi
https://doi.org/10.33092/0025-8326mp2025.2.36-44
Abstract
The incidence of cancer among people is increasing worldwide. Modern methods make it possible to cure cancer patients in the early stages of the disease, but they do not help patients with metastases to other organs. Therefore, the synthesis of new medicine and the search for natural drugs to stop the progression of malignant tumors is very relevant. Back in 1929, Soviet scientists showed that crucin (frozen/thawed T. cruzi epimastig-otes) had antitumor and antimetastatic activity.
The review is devoted to modern views on the nature of this phenomenon. It turned out that the interaction of the parasite, host and cancer cells includes a number of mechanisms depending on the type of tumor, virulence and other characteristics of a particular strain of T. cruzi, the immunogenicity of parasites or their lysate, op-tions for stimulating the immune response, as well as the presence of proteins or enzymes that ensure selective invasion and destruction of abnormal cells by trypanosomes. According to the assumption, some glycoproteins of the surface membrane of metacyclic trypomastigotes, such as Gp82, can lower the level of autophagy of met-astatic cells and lead to their death. And the unique enzyme of the parasite trans-sialidase and its surface mucins are able to reduce the sialylation of tumor cells, which become available to T-lymphocytes and natural killer cells (NK) that destroy metastases.
Future research should aim to achieve a more accurate understanding of the active molecular and cellular mechanisms of the effect of T. cruzi lysates on cancer cells. Their goal is to use the antitumor potential of crucin in innovative therapy of cancer patients with distal metastases.
About the Authors
O. A. KhokhlovaRussian Federation
Moscow
D. B. Goncharov
Russian Federation
Moscow
Helena Lucia Carneiro Santos
Brazil
Rio de Janeiro
References
1. Klyueva N.G., Roskin G.I. Bioterapiya zlokachestvennykh opukholei. 1946, M.: USSR Academy of Medical Sciences, 224 (in Russian)
2. Kallinnikova V.D. Antitumor properties of the flagellated protozoan Trypanosoma cruzi. 2004, M, Moscow State University, 279 (in Russian)
3. Kaufman C.D., Farre C., Biscari L. et al. Trypanosoma cruzi, Chagas disease and cancer: putting together the pieces of a complex puzzle // Frontiers in Cell and Development Biology, 2023; 11: 1260423. DOI: 10.3389/fcell.2023.1260423
4. Tyler K.M., Engman D.M. The life cycle of Trypanosoma cruzi revisited // International Journal for Parasitology, 2001; 31(5-6): 472-481. DOI: 10.1016/s0020-7519(01)00153-9
5. Ferreira R.C., Kessler R.L., Lorenzo M.G. et al. Colonization of Rhodnius prolixus gut by Trypanosoma cruzi involves an extensive parasite killing // Parasitology, 2016; 143(4): 434-443. DOI: 10.1017/S0031182015001857
6. Anticancer antibiotic crucin. Collection of articles, edited by Levinson L.B., Klyueva N.G., 1968, M.: Moscow State Uni-versity, 360. (in Russian)
7. Sheklakova L.A., Kallinikova V.D., Karpenko L.P., Tibayrenc M. Effect of lysed Trypanosoma cruzi of different genetic groups on human cancer cell cultures // Biomedical technologies. 2001; 16: 224-230. (in Russian)
8. Kallinnikova V.D., Batmonkh Ts., Kravtsov E.G., Karpenko L.P., Pakhorukova L.V., Ogloblina T.A. Antibodies to Trypanosoma cruzi accompanying the antitumor effect of lysed epimastigotes in vivo // Bulletin of Moscow University, Ser.16. Biology. 2008; 2: 26-31. (in Russian)
9. Oliveira C., Holetz F.B., Alves L.R. et al. Modulation of virulence factors during Trypanosoma cruzi differentiation // Pathogens, 2023; 12: 32. DOI: 10.3390/pathogens12010032
10. Cortez C., Sobreira T.J.P., Maeda F.Y. et al. The gp82 surface molecule of Trypanosoma cruzi metacyclic forms // Subcellular Biochemistry. 2014; 74:137-150. DOI: 10.1007/978-94-007-7305-9_6
11. Atayde V.D., Jastiulionis M.G., Cortez M. et al. A recombinant protein based on Trypanoso-ma cruzi surface molecule gp82 induces apoptic cell death in melanoma cells. Melanoma Research, 2008; 18: 172-183. DOI: 10.1097/CMR.0b013e-3282feeaab
12. Maeda F.Y., Cortez C., Yoshida N. Cell signaling during Trypanosoma cruzi invasion // Frontiers in immunology. 2012; 3: 361. DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2012.00361
13. Reddy A., Caler E.V., Andrews N.W. Plasma membrane repair is mediated by Ca2+ - regulated exocytosis of lysosomes // Cell. 2001; 106(2): 157-169. DOI: 10.1016/s0092-8674(01)00421-4
14. Rodrigues J.P.F., Onofre T.S., Barbosa B.C. et al. Host cell protein LAMP-2 is the receptor for Trypanosoma cruzi surface molecule gp82 that mediates invasion // Cellular Microbiology. 2019; 21(5): e13003. DOI: 10.1111/cmi.13003
15. Yoshida N., Favoreto Jr S., Ferreira A.T. et al. Signal transduction induced in Trypanosoma cruzi metacyclic trypomastigotes during the invasion of mammalian cells // Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research, 2000; 33(3): 269-278. DOI: 10.1590/s0100-879x2000000300003
16. Manque P.M., Neira I., Atayde V.D. et al. Cell adhesion and Ca2+ signaling activity in stable transfected Trypanosoma cruzi epimastigotes expressing the metacyclic stage-specific surface molecule gp82 // Infection and Immunity. 2003; 71(3):1561-1565. DOI: 10.1128/IAI.71.3.1561-1565.2003
17. Bayer-Santos E., Cunha-e-Silva N.L., Yoshida N. et al. Expression and cellular trafficking of GP82 and GP90 glycoproteins during Trypanosoma cruzi metacyclogenesis // Parasites &Vectors. 2013; 6: 127. DOI: 10.1186/1756-3305-6-127
18. Alvarez V.E., Kosec G., Anna C.S. et al. Autophagy is involved in nutritional stress response and differentiation in Trypanosoma cruzi // The Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2008; 283(6): 3454-3464. DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M708474200
19. Vanrell M.C., Losinno A.D., Cueto J.A. et al. The regulation of autophagy differentially affects Trypanosoma cruzi metacyclogenesis // PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases. 2017; 11(11): e0006049. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0006049
20. Romano P.S., Arboit M.A., Vazquez C.L. et al. The autophagic pathway is a key component in the lysosomal dependent entry of Trypanosoma cruzi into the host cell // Autophagy. 2009; 5(1): 6-18. DOI: 10.4161/auto.5.1.7160
21. Salassa B.N., Romano P.S. Autophagy: a necessary process during the Trypanosoma cruzi life-cycle // Virulence. 2018; 10(1): 460-469. DOI: 10.1080/21505594.2018.1543517
22. Mowers E.E., Sharifi M.N., Macleod K.F. Autophagy in cancer metastasis // Oncogene. 2017; 36: 1619-1630. DOI: 10.1038/onc.2016.333
23. Zhu W., Qu H., Xu K. et al. Differences in the starvation-induced autophagy response in MDA-MB-231 and MCF-7 breast cancer cells // Animal Cells and Systems. 2017; 21(3): 190-198. DOI: 10.1080/19768354.2017.1330763.
24. Garbar C., Mascaux C., Glustiniani J. et al. Chemotherapy treatment induces an increase of autophagy in the luminal breast cancer cell MCF7, but not in the triple-negative MDA-MB231 // Scientific Reports. 2017; 7: 7201. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-07489-x
25. Xu K., Zhu W., Xu A. et al. Inhibition of FOXO1-mediated autophagy promotes paclitaxel-induced apoptosis of MDA-MB-231 cells // Molecular Medicine Reports. 2022; 25: 72. DOI: 10.3892/mmr.2022.12588
26. Giorgi M.E., de Lederkremer R.M. Trans-sialidase and mucins of Trypanosoma cruzi an important interplay for parasite // Carbohydrate Research. 2011; 346(12): 1389-1393. DOI: 10.1016/j.carres.2011.04.006
27. Pereira M.E.A. A developmentally regulated neuraminidase activity of Trypanosoma cruzi // Science. 1983; 219(4591): 1444-1446. DOI:10.1126/science.6338592
28. Chaves L.B., Briones M.R., Schenkman S. Trans-sialidase from Trypanosoma cruzi epimastigotes is expressed at the stationary phase and is different from the enzyme expressed in trypomastigotes // Molecular and Biochemical Parasitology. 1993; 61(1): 97-106. DOI: 10.1016/0166-6851(93)90162-q
29. Mucci J., Risso M.G., Leguizamon M.S. et al. The trans-sialidase from Trypanosoma cruzi triggers apoptosis by target cell sialylation // Cellular Microbiology. 2006; 8(7): 1086-1095. DOI: 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2006.00689.x
30. Vandekerckhove F., Schenkman S., de Carvalho L.P. et al. Substrate specificity of the Trypanosoma cruzi trans-sialidase // Glycobiology. 1992; 2(6): 541-548. DOI: 10.1093/glycob/2.6.541
31. Lantos A.B., Carlevaro G., Araoz B. et al. Sialic acid glycobiology unveils Trypanosoma cruzi trypomastigote membrane physiology // PLOS Pathogens. 2016; 12(4): e1005559. DOI: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1005559
32. Harduin-Lepers A., Vallejo-Ruiz V., Krzewinski-Recchi M-A. et al. The human sialyltransferase family // Biochimie. 2001; 83(8), 727-737. DOI: 10.1016/s0300-9084(01)01301-3
33. Zhou X., Chi K., Zhang C. et al. Sialylation: a cloak for tumors to trick the immune system in the microenvironment // Biology (Basel). 2023; 12(6):832. DOI: 10.3390/biology12060832
34. Harduin-Lepers A., Krzewinski-Recchi M.-A., Colomb F. et al. Sialyltransferases function in cancer // Frontiers in Bioscience E4. 2012: 499-515. DOI: 10.2741/e396
35. Cui H, Lin Y., Yue L. et al. Differential expression of the alpha 2,3-sialic acid residues in breast cancer is associated with metastatic potential // Oncology Reports. 2011; 25(5): 1365-1371. DOI: 10.3892/or.2011.1192
36. Dobie C., Skropeta D. Insights into the role of sialylation in cancer progression and metastasis // British Journal of Cancer. 2021; 124: 76-90. DOI: 10.1038/s41416-020-01126-7
37. Rodriguez E., Boelaars K., Brown K. et al. Sialic acids in pancreatic cancer cells drive tumour-associated macrophage differentiation via the Siglec receptors Siglec-7 and Siglec-9 // Nature Communications. 2021; 12:1270. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-21550-4
38. Wu G., Murugesan G., Nagala M. et al. Ac-tivation of regulatory T cells triggers specific changes in glycosylation associated with Siglec-1-depen-dent inflammatory responses // Wellcome Open Research. 2021; 6: 134. DOI: 10.12688/wellcome-openres.16834.1
39. Janssen L.M.E., Ramsay E.E., Logsdon C.D. et al. The immune system in cancer metastasis: friend or foe? // Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer. 2017; 5:79. DOI: 10.1186/s40425-017-0283-9
Review
For citations:
Khokhlova O.A., Goncharov D.B., Santos H. Anticancer activity of the protozoan Trypanosoma cruzi. Medical Parasitology and Parasitic Diseases. 2025;(2):36-44. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.33092/0025-8326mp2025.2.36-44
JATS XML







